The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms by N.K. Jemisin

Spoiler warning: this review discusses the ending in full. Read at your own risk.

Most epic fantasy has the same job description, whether it admits it or not: something has gone wrong with the world, and by the last page, order gets restored. Jemisin isn't interested in that job. Yeine doesn't show up in Sky to fix anything. In fact, she shows up to find out who killed her mother and gets dragged into a succession war she didn't ask for, and by the end, the thing that breaks isn't a curse or an invasion, it's the status quo itself, on purpose, with intent. That's a genuinely different shape for a fantasy novel to take, and it's the thing that made this one stick with me more than most.

Part of how she pulls that off is the worldbuilding, which does more structural work than atmosphere. The Darre, Yeine's people, are matrilineal; women hold the power, lineage runs through the mother, and it's simply how things are, not a twist. The Amn, who run Sky through the Arameri family, are the opposite: rigidly patrilineal, and that's presented as equally unremarkable to the people living inside it. Neither is exoticised and neither is the "correct" one. They're just two different answers to how a society organises itself, and Yeine gets stranded in the gap between them. That contrast isn't set dressing. It's the reason she reads as such an outsider at Sky, and the reason the people around her keep underestimating exactly how much power she's used to holding.

Then there are the gods, who are, frankly, a mess, in the best way. Nahadoth, Itempas, and Enefa were siblings once, and (Nahadoth) being enslaved to a mortal family for a couple thousand years hasn't exactly resolved the sibling stuff. There's betrayal, grief, and old romantic wreckage running underneath everything, plus a whole generation of god-children like Sieh caught in the middle of it. They're gods. Family is complicated even when you're immortal and can unmake stars. Does any of that stop them from being petty, seductive, or chaotic with each other? Clearly not and that's exactly what makes them fun to read instead of just cosmic set-piece machinery.

And then there's Nahadoth and Yeine, which is where the book stops being subtle and I stopped minding. He's an ancient, literally-embodied night god with a body count and no interest in playing nice, and he is completely magnetic about it. Yeine spends the whole book being pulled toward him against her better judgment, and by the end, I got it. Sometimes you just want the dangerous immortal to sweep in and offer you a way out of your very mortal, very political problems. I don't blame her for taking it.

Because that's what happens: Yeine dies (actually dies!), stabbed in the course of the plan she's been maneuvering toward all along and gets remade into a goddess, folded into the pantheon in Enefa's place, bound to Nahadoth in a way that's part romance and part cosmic restructuring. It's not a rescue. It's Yeine choosing to become powerful on her own terms rather than staying the disposable pawn everyone at Sky assumed she'd be. That's the payoff of the "no restoring order" instinct I mentioned up top: the ending doesn't put the universe back the way it was. It hands Yeine a permanent seat at the table that used to exclude her, and lets the old order stay broken.

That instinct isn't incidental to Jemisin, it's the whole project. In a 2015 Guardian interview, she laid out exactly why she won't write the version of fantasy that just quietly reinforces what's already there:

"As a black woman, I have no particular interest in maintaining the status quo. Why would I? The status quo is harmful, the status quo is significantly racist and sexist and a whole bunch of other things that I think need to change. With epic fantasy there is a tendency for it to be quintessentially conservative, in that its job is to restore what is perceived to be out of whack... I don't really understand why so many fantasy writers choose to focus on worlds that just seem strangely denuded. But to them I guess it doesn't seem strange. And I guess that's their privilege. It isn't mine."

You can feel that conviction on every page of this book, not as a lecture, but as a structural choice. She's not writing a Cinderella-with-gods story where the girl gets swept off, and the world snaps back into place. She's writing a girl who ends the book with more power than the system that tried to erase her ever accounted for.

It's a book that asks a little patience of you up front and pays it back with interest.

Rating: 4/5. Read it if you want your fantasy political, matriarchal, and unbothered about restoring the old order — I'm already lined up for the rest of the trilogy.

Next
Next

Lady Tremaine, by Rachel Hochhauser